WARNING - By their nature, text files cannot include scanned images and tables. 
The process of converting documents to text only, can cause formatting changes and 
misinterpretation of the contents can sometimes result. Wherever possible you 
should refer to the pdf version of this document.


CAIRNGORMS NATIONAL PARK AUTHORITY 
Planning Paper 2 18 September 2009 

CAIRNGORMS NATIONAL PARK AUTHORITY 


Title: 
REPORT ON CALLED-IN PLANNING APPLICATION 

Prepared by: 
MARY GRIER, PLANNING OFFICER 
(DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT) 

DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED: FULL PLANNING PERMISSION 
FOR THE ERECTION OF A CHILDREN’S MINI-FUN RIDE AT 
LANDMARK, CARRBRIDGE 

REFERENCE: 09/197/CP 

APPLICANT: LANDMARK FOREST ADVENTURE PARK, 
CARRBRIDGE, C/O NORTEC CONSULTING ENGINEERS LTD., 
INVERNESS 

DATE CALLED-IN: 26 JUNE 2009 

RECOMMENDATION : APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS 


Fig. 1 - Location Plan 



PAGE 2

SITE DESCRIPTION AND PROPOSAL 

1. Full planning permission is sought in this application for the erection of a 
children’s mini fun ride within the grounds of the Landmark Forest Adventure 
Park in Carrbridge. The ‘mini mega coaster’ is a gravity coaster ride, 
contained within an area measuring 29 metres x 17 metres. The actual track 
length extends to approximately 233 metres, and at its highest point would 
be 9.4 metres above ground. A roller coaster train, with a seating capacity of 
24, would traverse along the rails. The train would operate at a maximum 
speed of 24.6 miles per hour, with each ride lasting 50 seconds. The ride 
apparatus would be enclosed by 1.8 metre high fencing consisting of weld 
mesh panels, framed in galvanised tubular steel sections. The main structure 
steelwork of the proposed ride would also consist of tubular steel sections, 
painted in a combination of ‘forest green’ and ‘russet brown’ colours. A 
passenger waiting / loading platform is also proposed at one end of the 
facility. It is essentially a raised platform, accessed by a set of steps and 
covered by a monopitch roof of single skin aluminium cladding.1 The floor of 
the loading station would be a galvanised steel plate. 

Fig. 2 : Colour photo looking into the site from the north west, 
with the Landmark waterslides in the distance 

2. The mini ride is proposed in a partially wooded area of the Landmark site, 
between the existing waterslide facility to the north east and the former 
sawmill to the west. A network of gravel paths traverse close to the site. 
The access arrangement to the ride would be via a 2.0 metre wide entrance 
and exit path on the east side of the ride leading to / from the loading station. 
In addition, to the west of the proposed ride a 3.0 metre wide access area 
would also be created to facilitate maintenance operations. The construction 
of the paths would be by compacting and levelling existing ground, which 
would be covered in bark. 

1 No colour choice has been specified for the roof structure at present. 



PAGE 3

3. Details have been provided on the method of construction of the proposed 
mini fun ride. The structure is designed to be easily assembled and removed. 
It has no permanent foundations and would be founded on the surface of the 
levelled ground. It is intended that the area would be allowed to seed 
naturally from the surrounding flora. Supporting information also offers that 
the area could be covered with bark chips if considered to be more 
aesthetically acceptable. The various components of the ride would be 
brought to the site by flat bodied lorries. It is anticipated that this would 
occur during the winter months when the Landmark centre has a much 
reduced level of operation. The area around the intended works would be 
closed and cordoned off from the public while construction operations are 
on going. Any crane required to erect and assemble the structure would be 
operated from the paths immediately adjacent to the site. 

Fig. 3 : Architect's drawing showing the perspective view of proposed mini fun ride 

4. Tree species within the proposed site area are predominantly Scots pine and 
Norway spruce, together with a ground layer of heather, blueberry and 
juniper. The woodland forms part of the surrounding wider woodland area, 
much of which is within the overall boundaries of the Landmark Adventure 
Forest Park. The applicants have elaborated on the reasons for selecting the 
proposed site, referring to it being within an area where there is little impact 
on the wildlife of the wood, as well as it being in close proximity to other 
recreational installations. Landmark consider this a suitable area for the 
development of leisure based attractions, distinct from other areas within 
their overall landholding, where the site operators carry out a ‘no significant 
development’ policy. 


PAGE 4

Supporting Information 

5. A bat survey was undertaken at the site and the report has been submitted 
with the application. No evidence of bat use was found during the survey and 
it has therefore been concluded that no bat roosts will be destroyed or 
disturbed during the proposed works. Notwithstanding the survey findings, 
the report also contains a number of ‘good practise’ recommendations. 
Where felling of trees occur any part that it is thought could contain a cavity 
should be ‘soft felled’ and the part containing any cavity should be left 
undisturbed for 24 hours before removal. It is also advised that if bats are 
discovered during any future work all operations in that area should 
immediately cease and contact should be made with a licensed bat worker 
and Scottish Natural Heritage. 
 
6. Information has been provided on how the visitor centre at Landmark 
operates, as well as providing background to the requirement for the 
proposed mini fun ride and how it is considered to fit with the existing 
concept. At the time of opening in 1970 Landmark was the first purpose 
built centre in Europe, initially trading as an interpretative centre. However, 
following a period in the 1980’s where its viability was questionable, it 
became necessary to add new attractions, with the business consequently 
growing over the past 25 years. The visitor facility is marketed as ‘Landmark 
Forest Adventure Park’ with its concept being summarised in its promotional 
statement of ‘fun, discovery and adventure in an ancient forest.’ Information 
submitted in support of this application suggests that Landmark is a rare type 
of park, positioned “between a country park with passive / active play 
elements and some interpretational content, and a theme park with pure fun 
and adventure elements.” The diverse range of attractions within Landmark 
includes the Watercoaster, the RopeworX and Tarzan Trail high level 
challenge courses, the Skydive parachute jump simulator and the Pinnacle 
Climbing Wall, as well as the tree top squirrel trail and a variety of indoor 
attractions. The applicants consider that the proposed mini ride would fit 
with that existing concept without changing the perceived status as a Forest 
Adventure Park. 

7. Positive aspects of the mini ride which have been identified in the supporting 
submission include reference to its small footprint and the fact that it would 
be a low level, lightweight, relatively quiet and compact ride, which is 
considered to meet Landmark’s criteria for “fun and adventure focus but 
without tipping the balance into the pure fun and amusement park area.” It is 
also pointed out in the submission that the proposed fun ride has no 
foundations and is removable, which would therefore provide Landmark with 
the opportunity to renew their attraction stock on the same site with 
minimal upheaval. It is also intended to allow the site to partially regenerate 
to a natural state within the operational limits of the ride. The supporting 
information also sets out how the proposed attraction is envisaged to fit with 
the aims of the National Park. 

8. In terms of the future development of the Landmark facility, the approach 
which is currently envisaged by the owners is the addition of small scale 
attractions and improvements to the existing facilities. In addition to the 


PAGE 5

proposed mini fun ride, works which the operators are considering 
undertaking in the period between 2010 and 2012 include refurbishment of 
the microworld exhibition, improvements to the Wild Forest Maze, the 
provision of additional toilet facilities, refurbishment of the shop and 
restaurant, and the possible installation of a zip line. 

Fig. 4 : Colour photo showin a typical example of proposed mini fun ride 


DEVELOPMENT PLAN CONTEXT 

National policy 

9. SPP2 : Economic Development focuses on a number of themes including 
securing new development in sustainable locations and also safeguarding and 
enhancing the environment. On the latter theme SPP2 recognises the 
importance of the environment as a resource and notes that a high quality 
environment can be used to promote an area for business development, as 
well as provide a range of economic opportunities. The natural and built 
heritage are discussed and planning authorities are advised that their 
consideration of proposals should seek to minimise adverse effects. In a 
section entitled ‘Development in Rural Areas’ SPP2 makes particular 
reference to the promotion of sustainable economic and social development 
of the areas communities being a key aim of Scotland’s National Parks. It 
advises that developments should be accommodated where they are 
appropriate to the purposes and character of the Park and that their siting 
and design should be of a high quality and support the Park’s image and 
appearance. 

10. Other national level advice is contained in NPPG 14 on Natural Heritage. 
It strikes a positive note stating that conservation and development can often 
be fully compatible, and the potential for conflict can be minimised. In 
relation to statutory designations, and in particular National Parks, para. 33 
states that “while conservation of the natural heritage will be a key objective 


PAGE 6

in any National Park, the Government considers that due weight must also be 
given to the social and economic interests of local communities.” 

11. NPPG 14 discusses wider natural heritage issues, outwith statutory 
designations, and stresses that natural heritage is found throughout the 
countryside, and that efforts should be made to safeguard and enhance the 
wider natural heritage beyond the confines of nationally designated areas. 
Among features listed as being of potential value in the development of 
habitat networks are woodlands, rivers and burns. Para. 50 stresses the 
importance of trees and woodlands, both as wildlife habitats and in terms of 
their contribution to landscape character and quality. NPPG 14 highlights 
the duty of Planning Authorities, under section 159 of the Town and Country 
Planning (Scotland) Act 1997, to ensure that wherever appropriate, planning 
permissions make adequate provision for the preservation or planting of 
trees. 

Highland Structure Plan 2001 

12. Section 2.7 of the Highland Structure Plan discusses the economy and 
tourism in particular, noting that tourism is a vital element of the Highland 
economy. The identity of the Highlands includes “its built heritage, rich 
wildlife, scenic beauty, history and culture” which are described as the 
foundations on which tourism and recreation activities are based. The 
Structure Plan strategy aims to build on the Highland identity and to “take a 
proactive approach to the wise use of the natural environment as a primary 
resource” for tourism. 

13. The Structure Plan notes that tourism makes major demands on 
infrastructure and facilities and also notes that there is scope for 
improvement in the quality and level of provision. Policy T2 on Tourism 
Development confirms Highland Council’s support for high quality tourism 
development proposals, particularly those which extend the season, provide 
wet weather opportunities, spread economic benefits more widely and 
provide opportunities for the sustainable enjoyment and interpretation of the 
area’s heritage. 

14. The Highland Structure Plan includes a detailed section on the 
environment and topics such as nature conservation and landscape are 
discussed. Para. 2.13.1 notes that the abundance of natural habitats and 
species is a key element of Highland’s identity and constitutes one of the 
region’s main strengths. The Structure Plan details the hierarchy of 
protection of nature conservation interests, but also notes that such interests 
are not confined only to designated sites. Policy N1 on Nature 
Conservation requires new developments to minimise their impact on the 
nature conservation resource and enhance it wherever possible. 

15. Section 2.14 of the Plan discusses Landscape where it is declared that “no 
other attribute of Highland defines more the intrinsic character and nature of 
the area than its landscape.” The Plan notes that associated with such 
landscapes are the communities that live in harmony with them and the 


PAGE 7

wildlife that is adapted to their conditions. It is advised that the protection 
and enhancement of landscape and scenery must be positively addressed. 
Policy L4 on Landscape Character states that “the Council will have 
regard to the desirability of maintaining and enhancing present landscape 
character in the consideration of development proposals.” 

Badenoch and Strathspey Local Plan (1997) 

16. On the general subject of Tourism and Recreation, section 2.2.9 of the Local 
Plan notes that activities of this nature will continue to make a vital 
contribution to the economy, but also emphasises that the priority is to 
ensure that “broadening the range and quality of facilities and accommodation 
is balanced with protecting the areas exceptional scenic and heritage 
resources.” The plan suggests within communities and on their edges that 
tourist accommodation, recreation and leisure facilities of a scale appropriate 
to the community concerned will be promoted. 

17. Section 2.2.10 of the Plan, entitled Tourism, states that the “Council will 
encourage the development of tourist accommodation and facilities at 
suitable sites within or immediately adjoining communities” and that “priority 
will be given to expansion of existing facilities.” This section of the Plan also 
requires that that tourism proposals should “either associate well with the 
prevailing pattern of building, or be well absorbed visually by landform and 
trees. 

18. The landscape conservation policy is detailed in section 2.5.10. It is the policy 
to conserve areas of landscape importance including waterside land, open 
areas and scenic views. It is also advised that development proposals will be 
considered carefully in respect of their impacts on conservation and the 
environment. 

19. The proposed site is within the settlement area of Carrbridge and is on land 
which is identified in the Badenoch and Strathspey Local Plan as ‘Commerce / 
Tourism.’ Under the heading of employment Section 5.2.1 specifically refers 
to the Landmark Centre, stating that “the Council will encourage 
consolidation of the Visitor Centre to complement new reception, heritage 
facilities, and forest trails. Further development is subject to safeguarding the 
wooded setting and satisfactory servicing.” Section 5.5.3 of the Plan, entitled 
‘Other Trees’ is also relevant, advising that important woodland and trees 
will be protected throughout the village. The Landmark Centre is one of the 
specific locations mentioned where there are significant groups of trees. 

Cairngorms National Park Plan (2007) 

20. The Cairngorms National Park Plan sets out the vision for the park for the 
next 25 years. The plan sets out the strategic aims that provide the long 
term framework for managing the National Park and working towards the 25 
year vision. Under the heading of ‘conserving and enhancing the special 
qualities’ strategic objectives for landscape, built and historic environment 
include maintaining and enhancing the distinctive landscapes across the Park, 
ensuring that development complements and enhances the landscape 


PAGE 8

character of the Park, and ensuring that new development in settlements and 
surrounding areas and the management of public spaces complements and 
enhances the character, pattern and local identity of the built and historic 
environment. 

21. Under the heading of ‘Living and Working in the Park’ the Plan advises that 
sustainable development means that the resources and special qualities of the 
national park are used and enjoyed by current generations in such a way that 
future generations can continue to use and enjoy them. Section 5.2.3 of the 
Park Plan acknowledges that tourism is one of the primary forms of 
employment in the Park, although many jobs in this and other sectors are 
highly seasonal and with little long term security. Strategic objectives for 
economy and employment include creating conditions that are conducive to 
business growth and investment that are consistent with the special qualities 
of the Park and its strategic location and the promotion of green business 
opportunities. Section 5.3 of the Plan concerns ‘enjoying and understanding 
the park’ noting that the Cairngorms National Park is known for its 
outstanding environment and outdoor recreation opportunities and advises 
that the vision for the Park seeks to “go further and develop a world class 
destination which plays a significant part in the regional and national tourism 
economy.” Strategic objectives for sustainable tourism include : • 
raising awareness of the Park as a premier, year round, rural tourism 
destination; 

• recognising its outstanding natural heritage and its National Park status; 
• improving and maintaining the quality of the experience of the Park for all 
visitors, communities and those working in the tourism industry; 
• maintaining a high quality environment by encouraging sound 
environmental management by all those involved in tourism in the Park; 
• developing a wide range of opportunities for visitors to experience and 
enjoy the special qualities distinctiveness and natural and cultural heritage 
of the Park; and 
• encouraging an optimum flow and spread of visitors across the Park and 
minimising the social and environmental impact including traffic generated 
by visitors and conflicts between different forms of recreation. 
. 

CONSULTATIONS 

22.The CNPA’s Sustainable Tourism Officer has assessed the proposal and 
comments that the Landmark Forest Adventure Centre is a popular family 
visitor centre, offering a variety of attractions. She considers that the 
proposed mini-mega coaster would be a popular addition to the Centre. It is 
accepted that there is a need within the visitor attraction market for ongoing 
refreshment of the visitor experience to maintain interest and visitor 
numbers. The proposed development is likely to help maintain or increase 
visitor numbers to the site and could also potentially provide a small boost to 
the wider local economy. While generally positive towards the proposed 
development, the Sustainable Tourism Officer notes that she would like to 
see a ride more clearly themed to fit with the Forest Park, although she 
accepts that this may not be a cost effective option for the development. 


PAGE 9

23.The CNPA’s Heritage and Land Management Group considered the 
ecological implications of the development proposal. Reference has been 
made in the response to a number of factors including protected mammal 
species, ants and juniper. Bats and red squirrels are the protected mammal 
species of relevance to this site. The ecology officer accepts the findings of 
the bat survey which indicates that no bat roost survey suitability was 
recorded. It was also noted that no squirrel dreys are present within the 
trees that are proposed to be felled. However, given that red squirrels are 
generally present within the Landmark development it is recommended that a 
pre-felling survey of the trees be undertaken and in the event that any 
squirrel drey is found to be present within the trees that are proposed to be 
felled, all work should cease and advice should be sought from the CNPA 
prior to proceeding further. 

24.The response from the ecology officer also notes that there are several ants 
nests in close proximity to the development proposal (and they have been 
identified on the site layout plan). Although they are close to the existing 
pathways in the vicinity they do not at present demonstrate any significant 
impacts from trampling or human interference. The mini fun ride is proposed 
to be enclosed by a fence which would be sufficient to prevent people 
entering the adjacent woodland where the ants nests are present. However, 
as an additional measure it is recommended that the ants nests are regularly 
monitored. 

25.The ecology officer also notes that there are several stands of Juniper within 
the proposed development site, with Juniper being a priority species on the 
UK BAP, as numbers are declining. In order to prevent the decline of Juniper 
in the vicinity, it is recommended that it is translocated across the path to 
suitable areas of habitat. Advice is provided within the consultation response 
on translocation methods.2 The applicants have been made aware of this and 
have confirmed their acceptance of the requirement to translocate the 
juniper. 

REPRESENTATIONS 

26. No representations have been received in respect of the proposed 
development. 

2 The optimum time for Juniper translocation is late October to early December. It is suggested that 
the receptor site should be located across the gravel path, in a relatively open area with no shading. 
Appropriate size holes should be prepared in the receptor site. As large as possible around the 
Juniper stem should be dug by hand in order to ensure that the entire rootball is removed. A hessian 
sack should be tied around the rootball and the entire plant should then be gently lifted to the 
receptor location. The plant should be placed in the hole and the soil backfilled and firmed around 
the plant, followed by thorough watering. 



PAGE 10

APPRAISAL 

27.The main issues to examine in this planning application are the principle of a 
development of this nature, and then the more detailed aspects of the 
proposals, including the specific location and the potential impact on the 
natural heritage of the area. The incremental growth of recreation and 
leisure facilities which has taken place at the Landmark site since its inception 
in 1970 has established the principle of development of this nature at this 
location. As detailed in paragraph 19 of this report the subject site, as well as 
the wider landholding of the Landmark complex, is allocated in the existing 
Badenoch and Strathspey Local Plan (1997) for ‘Commerce / Tourism.’ In 
addition, specific reference is made in the Plan to the Landmark Centre, with 
Section 5.2.1 indicating that further development would be considered 
subject to safeguarding the wooded setting and satisfactory servicing. 

28. The applicants have indicated in supporting information that the proposed 
site is considered suitable as it would have little impact on wildlife in the 
wider woodland area, over much of which the site operators have a self 
imposed policy of ‘no significant development.’ In terms of the impacts on 
the natural heritage of the area, the consultation response from the CNPA’s 
Heritage and Land Management Group indicates an acceptance of the 
proposed site. HLM are satisfied with the findings of the bat survey which 
was carried out, and it is also acknowledged that no red squirrel dreys are 
present within the trees that are proposed to be felled. Conditions are 
recommended to ensure the protection and monitoring of ants nests, as well 
as a requirement for the translocation of juniper from the actual site. 

29. Additionally, as regards the proposed location, it is in relatively close 
proximity to many of the existing attractions (located between the 
waterslides and the old sawmill) and is on the edge of the woodland, thereby 
avoiding inappropriate encroachment into the wider woodland area. The 
addition of the mini fun ride in this location would essentially consolidate the 
developed area. At its maximum height the actual ride extends to 9.4 metres 
and when taken in the context of its setting on the edge of the wider 
woodland area and its proximity to the high level waterslide structure, I am 
of the view that the visual impact will be minimal. Reference has been made 
in supporting documentation to the tubular steel sections of the ride being 
painted a combination of ‘forest green’ and ‘russet brown.’ Such colours have 
the potential to blend with the forest setting. However, I would recommend 
that the specific colours of the overall structure, including the train element, 
be the subject of agreement prior to any development commencing. The 
‘perspective view’ of the proposed mini fun ride, as shown in figure 3, depicts 
the inclusion of signage (‘Crazy Train’) mounted at the highest point of the 
ride and the dimensions specified indicate that that the sign would be 1.7 
metres high. The addition of large, prominently positioned signage would not 
in my view be an appropriate addition, and would have a negative visual 
impact. I recommend in the event of consideration being given to the 
granting of planning permission that this signage be omitted. 

30. In terms of the nature of the mini fun ride proposed, it is similar to that 
which may be commonly found in amusement theme parks and is not 


PAGE 11

therefore unique to the forest adventure concept which has developed at 
Landmark. However, other attractions already on the site, such as the 
waterslide for example, could also be considered a departure from the forest 
adventure concept. The applicants have provided details of the background 
to introducing the mini fun ride, with reference made to the need to grow 
the attraction base and to change the mix of attractions on offer and 
generally “embrace change to remain viable.” The marketing ethos at 
Landmark is ‘fun, discovery and adventure’ and the proposed mini fun ride 
would fit with that. Its introduction would not detract from other core 
attractions offered at the facility, particularly those which assist in 
experiencing and understanding the forest setting. 

31. In considering the addition of a new attraction at Landmark which would 
assist its long term growth and viability, there is a need to acknowledge how 
the facility accords particularly with the third and fourth aims of the National 
Park. Landmark is reputed to be one of the most visited attractions within 
the Cairngorms National Park and through its interpretation facilities, 
combined with more adventure based attractions such as the waterslides and 
high level challenge courses, it contributes towards promoting understanding 
and enjoyment of the area. From the point of view of contributing towards 
the social and economic development of the area the applicants have pointed 
out that 95% of the employees at Landmark live within the Cairngorms 
National Park, and that the annual wage bill is in the region of £750,000. 


IMPLICATIONS FOR THE AIMS OF THE NATIONAL PARK 

Conserve and Enhance the Natural and Cultural Heritage of the Area 

32. The proposed positioning of the mini fun ride and the associated perimeter 
fencing is at a location within the Landmark site which minimises the impact 
on the natural heritage of the area. Monitoring and protective measures 
would also be put in place in respect of protecting ants and red squirrels in 
the vicinity of the site, as well as measures to ensure that juniper currently 
growing on the subject site is appropriately translocated. 

Promote Sustainable Use of Natural Resources 

33. On the basis of the details provided regarding the proposed materials, and 
the fact that the development will be manufactured overseas the proposal is 
not considered to promote the sustainable use of natural resources. 

Promote Understanding and Enjoyment of the Area 

34. The general principle of providing additional recreational facilities at the 
established Landmark Forest Adventure Centre would further assist users of 
the facility in enjoying the area. 


PAGE 12

Promote Sustainable Economic and Social Development of the Area 

35. The introduction of an additional attraction at Landmark is likely to attract 
increased visitor use and would therefore be of benefit to the economic 
development of the area. It would also assist in providing continuing 
employment opportunities in the area. 

RECOMMENDATION 

That Members of the Committee support a recommendation to grant full 
planning permission for the erection of a mini-fun ride at land south west 
at Landmark Forest Adventure Centre, Carrbridge, subject to the 
following conditions : 

1. The development to which this permission relates must be begun within five 
years from the date of this permission. 

2. Prior to the commencement of development a pre-felling red squirrel survey 
shall be undertaken of all trees to be felled and the results shall be submitted 
for the written agreement of the Cairngorms National Park Authority acting 
as Planning Authority, which shall be obtained before any development 
proceeds. In the event that any squirrel drey is found to be present no work 
shall be undertaken without the written permission of the CNPA. 

3. Prior to the commencement of development, details of a programme of 
monitoring of the condition of the ants nests in the vicinity of the subject site 
(as identified on drawing no. 1573-04 Rev A) shall be submitted for the 
written agreement of the Cairngorms National Park Authority acting as 
Planning Authority and thereafter development shall proceed in accordance 
with the agreed programme. 

4. Prior to the commencement of development proposals for the translocation 
of juniper from the site shall be submitted for the written agreement of the 
Cairngorms National Park Authority acting as Planning Authority. The 
detailed proposals shall include identification of the new location, as well as 
comprehensive details of the procedures included in the translocation 
process, including details of the timeframe for the process to take place. The 
translocation shall thereafter take place in accordance with the agreed 
proposals. 

5. Prior to the commencement of development details of all signage (including 
location, materials and dimensions) associated with the proposed mini fun 
ride shall be submitted for the written agreement of the Cairngorms National 
Park Authority acting as Planning Authority. For the avoidance of doubt the 
‘crazy train’ signage shown on the ‘Perspective View of the Roller Coaster’ 
(drawing Tav.0/1) is not permitted. 

6. Prior to the commencement of development, details of the proposed colour 
scheme for all aspects of the development shall be submitted for the written 


PAGE 13

agreement of the Cairngorms National Park Authority acting as Planning 
Authority and development shall thereafter proceed in accordance with the 
approved details. 

7. In the event of the permanent cessation of use of the mini fun ride, the 
structure shall be removed and the site shall be reinstated. Details of 
proposed restoration / reinstatement proposals shall be submitted for the 
written agreement of the Cairngorms National Park Authority acting as 
Planning Authority and shall thereafter proceed in accordance with the 
approved details. 

Advice notes : 

A. In respect of condition no. 4 of this permission, advice should be sought from 
the CNPA’s Heritage and Land Management Group on the juniper 
translocation process. 

B. Care should be taken to avoid the spread of invasive, non-native species to 
the site. In the event of any such species arriving at the site it is 
recommended that they are removed as soon as possible and disposed of 
appropriately. 

C. Red squirrels are one of a number of species protected under Schedule 5 of 
the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 (as amended under the Nature 
Conservation (Scotland) Act 2004). Section 9(4) of the Act makes it an 
offence to intentionally or recklessly damage a red squirrel drey. 
It is now an offence to intentionally or recklessly 

• Kill, injure or take (capture) a red squirrel; 
• Damage, destroy or obstruct access to any structure or place which a 
red squirrel uses for shelter or protection; 
• Disturb a red squirrel whilst it is occupying a structure or place which 
it uses for that purpose. 


Mary Grier 
planning@cairngorms.co.uk 

8 September 2009 

The map on the first page of this report has been produced to aid in the statutory process of dealing with planning applications. 
The map is to help identify the site and its surroundings and to aid Planning Officers, Committee Members and the Public in the 
determination of the proposal. Maps shown in the Planning Committee Report can only be used for the purposes of the 
Planning Committee. Any other use risks infringing Crown Copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Maps 
produced within this Planning Committee Report can only be reproduced with the express permission of the Cairngorms 
National Park Authority and other Copyright holders. This permission must be granted in advance.